The original "selfie", using an oatmeal box pinhole camera 1977 |
So I was glad to get this artist’s email that expressed his
true feelings that yes, rejection stung and it was personal. He went on to say
what he learned from the experience. Bravo! Isn’t that what rejection is supposed
to do? Teach us lessons and build our character and make us try even harder to
either understand and/or to make something else? Buddy, I have been right there
with you in the rejected checked box more times than I can even count. 32
years’ worth (I kept them all) have already filled several expandable folders
and been moved to storage. The acceptances are also numerous but do not elicit
the same excitement as they once did because I get it….I get the game that is
played in the jury room and know that every entry, every show is a crapshoot. It is not personal anymore, it is business.
Yes, we work our butts off pouring heart and soul and time
and technique into a piece, only to have it put up for judgment and deemed
unworthy. By who....two or three people who have most likely been rejected
themselves in the past? Ever notice that the judges and juries are older folks?
They have “experience” and “credentials” and “gravitas” so therefore they know
their stuff. They have the authority to decide who is worthy of hanging and who
is not….. Goodness, I just had a flashing image of the Salem witch trials…. How
refreshing it would be to have a show on the caliber of say the Stark County
show, juried by some HS kids. Toss out
gravitas for gut instincts and reaction. After all, who do we make this stuff for
anyway? It is not the hoity-toity buying our work, it is the general public.
The hoity-toities go to agents and to other cities because “real” art isn’t
local. (Oh Lord don’t get me started on
the use of that word, especially in capital letters, because my Sag mouth will
get me in soooo much trouble).
Yes, we work our butts off pouring heart and soul and time
and love into a piece, only to have if put up for judgment and deemed unworthy.
Now think children, our kids, not our artwork. Same thing to many of us is it
not? Our kids are rejected quite often too…cut from sports teams, not voted the
homecoming queen, no ivy league diploma, and yet we (and they) keep going.
Tears are wiped and the game face put on to move ahead and override the
negative. As I have said in the past, one show’s rejected work may earn top
honors the next time it goes in front of the judges.
I used to think that as the art scene changed, I needed to
change with it. Nope. Wisdom comes with age and experience (as experience from
lack of wisdom as the saying goes). I
recently sold a piece painted in 2001. Now that work is 13 years old and I
thought for sure she would be a spinster in the series but it took the right
buyer at the right location to fall in love with it. The painting in question
had been submitted to 15 juried shows during the 4 years it was eligible
(anything older than 5 years should not be considered “new” work…oh Lord don’t
get me started on the date fudging issue….) and accepted into 4 of them. I
could have given up after the first four rejections, but I knew she had
potential. Then three acceptances in a row, 2 rejections, another acceptance
and then 5 rejections until retirement in 2005. Here we are in 2014 and she has
new home. It is about not giving up. Not
accepting someone else’s opinion as the final decree on the value of what you
make. Your work is judged and juried
against what else has been submitted to a particular show, and only those
pieces. Your work is judged and juried under the influence of personal
preferences by the people asked to take on the task. Could be a judge just put
their dog to sleep that week and is not up to seeing anything with a dog in
it. Could be the judge is an atheist and
anything remotely religious is out. Maybe the judge got a speeding ticket on
way to the gallery and is not in the mood to be doing the job to the best of
their professional and impartial ability. Point being, you just don’t know. One
can read all the credentials and degrees in a bio and it does not mean
jack-squat. A mounted exhibition is a result of what was submitted to choose
from, how much space is available, what categories are accepted and how the
awards are divided up, and the personal opinions of those who are making the
decisions on any given day. If you want to survive in this business we call
art, then thick skin and a depersonalization from your work is essential for
not letting it eat you alive. But so too, one must realize that everything you
make is not great. It may be okay, it may be good, but it is not awesome. Just
because we make it (and we call ourselves an artist) does not mean what we make is
art. (Oh Lord that is for another day, and please edit the nasty comments most
likely headed my way….).
You may hate my stuff, and many do, and I in turn am not a
fan of some things I see, but that does not mean I don’t respect it. Liking
something and respecting something are entirely different. I see tremendous
talent and skills and over the top creativity in many of our little band of
merry persons (oh Lord, if you are still listening, don’t get me started on the
PC thing….) we call the local (grrr) art scene, but that does not mean I want
to put it in my house. The artwork
produced in Canton is often incredible, but so too often not given the credit
due. (Oh Lord…Please don’t let me …..Oh never mind….)
Bottom line to the initial concept about rejection of our
work by a jury…..the thumbs up or thumbs down has to be put into context. One
also has to ask themselves, why am I submitting this to a juried show in the first
place?
No comments:
Post a Comment